This is a sweet idea. I'm down with it.

Yeah we'll shoot on the business and all the bookers that have treated us like crap!! Yeha We'll talk about paying our dues and the drugs, DRUGS!!!

I think Id like to take part as this is a cool idea

I'll talk about anything and everything, nearly everything annoys me these days

cool, bring it on!!!

According to several backsatge reports the following topics will be discussed on the upcoming Jay's Shoot Interview....

>> Breaking In
>> The Early Day's
>> "I'll Have A 'P' Please Bob"
>> Jay's Big Brother
>> "Let's Say Something Controversial!"
>> His Thoughts On The Bigger Boy's
>> The Attack Of The "Bottom-Feeders"
>> The Good Guys
>> The Cheese Day's
>> Moderation
>> Kielty & Co
>> The ****ing Oaf
>> More Talk Less Mongs

-- Edited by Carlito Cool at 19:36, 2007-10-18

Darth Mattitude wrote:

---

You also forgot Barley The TWCF Years

---

I've only been on TWCF for a year.

H-JD wrote:

---

Give it up, mongo. If one person in 6 months had agreed with the comparison, you might not sound so retarded. Alas, they did not.

Stop trying to turn threads into a flamewar when you clearly aren't up to it.

---

I'm not a moderator and I don't desire to be one again, but is there really any need for that kind of crap?

I Walk Alone wrote:

---

H-JD wrote:Give it up, mongo. If one person in 6 months had agreed with the comparison, you might not sound so retarded. Alas, they did not.Stop trying to turn threads into a flamewar when you clearly aren't up to it.
I'm not a moderator and I don't desire to be one again, but is there really any need for that kind of crap?

---

I have to agree. Didn't we come here to the Underground to get away from this type of flame baiting nonsense that was blighting the TWCF?

-- Edited by Man In Black at 22:37, 2007-03-27

-- Edited by Man In Black at 22:37, 2007-03-27

Darth Mattitude wrote:

---

No there isn't and Im sure Mr.JD has got the wrong end of the stick there... I didn't even read it like that...

---

Ok, then. I'll play along.

Here are 5+ instances of Barley using a reference to Patrick Kielty in a derogative way. It wouldn't take much of leap of imagination to work out what kind of cutting putdowns he has in store for me in this shoot interview.

If I did some actual digging, I could also find links to the ShadesofCMA introduction thread and the Underground topic in TWCF links where your beloved Barley initiated a conflict with yours truly because he didn't find me amusing enough. Was that not uncalled for?

Diplomatic enough for you?

Warn me if you really believe I'm out of order. Either way, I don't really care.

-- Edited by H-JD at 23:26, 2007-03-27

Right both of you two ladies please can we stop this please... Keep it at TWCF and not here please otherwise it'll be a 3 way at PM a Mania

Barley wrote:

---

Mongo? how long have the handbags been flying for, must be getting on. Is that the best you can do? MONGO! no, come on your better than that, dig down deep into the JD book of tripe and surprise me. Patronize me, insult me... better still have a word with the sidekick.

-- Edited by Barley at 13:52, 2007-03-28

---

Do you make a conscious effort to abandon logic or is it just a happy little surprise for anyone that still reads your stunted posts?

Why use a sledgehammer to crack an egg? JSB may be just a pretend racist, ageist and sexist but at least he pushes me to raise my game. I don't have that problem with you. So, yeah. Mongo it is.

Also, please do elaborate on how:

I have a book? (Did I write the book? Did Kielty write the book? Who wrote the book?)
Using a book of tripe is "better" than using the word 'mongo'?
Saying that someone has a sidekick works as an insult?
"Patronize me, insult me" is a defense that any non-spastic would employ?

I'll put some effort in when you can give me a logical answer to these questions. Keep in mind, you started this, so the apathy card will be a bit of a cop-out. Now get to it, mongo.

No thanks.

We both know that he started this supposed feud when he tried his hand at comedy critiquing. Which would have been fine had he not been as rib-tickling as a bullet to the head. He even admitted he was in the wrong. I admit I was being awkward, infact no I acted like a buffoon. So he probably shouldn't have kicked it off again last month. Or yesterday.

So either warn him for flamebaiting or ban me for rising to it because I'm sick and tired of trying to communicate with it.

I'm sorry too.

-- Edited by Jokerman at 23:13, 2007-03-28

will the 2 of you just bloody let it go

I told another cat on a message board this and I'll tell you guys as well, IT'S A F'N MESSAGE BOARD!


Grow the hell up and stop with this "he said..." BS, I can imagine a lot of people are like me in that they find this friggin' boring and repetitive.

Seriously if one of you admits that the other was right, where does it get you at the end of the day?

It's just some random schmuck on a message board that you'll never have to meet in person.

-- Edited by I Walk Alone at 01:30, 2007-03-29

H-JD wrote:

---

If we all just admitted that I'm in the right, this could have ended ages ago. My membership included.

It would have been flame-baiting if I had posted "Later, I'll give my uncensored opinions on simpleton_of_destruction". Right?
Obsessive Kielty referencing has only ever been used as an insult. Therefore, Barley was flamebaiting, and my good name is in the clear.

Just admit it, you know you want to. I'm a small, petty man and can't remember what this is about. So just say that you started all of this, each and every time, and I'll forget you ever existed. Bye, bye. Happy days.

*Ctrl + C just in case*

---

To clarify, I was merley pointing out the similarities between yourself (an unfunny, mildly cretinous poster) and Patrick Kielty ( a C grade "comedian" who by the way is about as funny as a puppy in a blender)