From the BBC and good for them. It's about time the minor certificates got tougher. I have to say there has been a few films of late I have sat through and thought how on earth did this get a +++ rating?
British film censors are toughening their stance on horror and violence in movies, taking a stricter line than their American counterparts.
Requests for 12A ratings for a number of Hollywood films were rejected by the British Board of Film Classification (BBFC), the body's annual report said.
Films like Cloverfield, I Am Legend and Disturbia got a PG-13 rating in the US, allowing access to children of any age.
In the UK, however, the films received the more restrictive 15 certificate.
The BBFC said the ratings showed an "increasing divergence" from the US system, regulated by the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA).
"While the MPAA takes a strict line on issues relating to nudity and sex, the BBFC is significantly more restrictive on violence and horror," BBFC director David Cooke said.
'Violent threat'
The distributors of Cloverfield, I Am Legend and Disturbia had been "very keen" for the films to receive a 12A classification, according to Mr Cooke. That rating means the film is suitable for viewers aged 12 and over. Children under 12 may also see 12A films if they are accompanied by an adult.
But the BBFC felt the films in question should be rated 15 for their "extended periods of intense violent threat and moments of horror".
Films rated 15 cannot be seen in a cinema by anyone under that age.
In the US, PG-13 means anybody can get into the film but parents are warned that some scenes that may be inappropriate for those under 13.
"The board's view was that, based on the extensive public consultation exercises, the films went beyond what most members of the UK public would consider appropriate for children younger than 15," Mr Cooke said.
These were not the only cases, he added. "Around 10% of films each year which come in with a particular category request end up with a higher one than asked for."
'Psychological impact'
The BBFC's current guidelines, published in 2005, were drafted following consultation with more than 11,000 people in the UK.
This year, the body will begin a new programme of consultation in preparation for its next set of guidelines, to be published in 2009.
The BBFC has pledged to consider a number of issues, among them the treatment of such issues as racism and homophobia and the importance of "psychological impact".
"BBFC decisions reflect UK public attitudes," said Mr Cooke, who has been BBFC director since 2004. "Notions of harm and appropriateness remain culturally dependent.
"That is why all past attempts to develop a pan-European film classification system have fallen at the first hurdle."
Long overdue move although they need to also consider things like bad language and nudity too.
I've seen films that are rated 12 with the "F" word in them or some minor nudity; and some 15 films that should have been 18 due to their excessive content. I was surprised that the South Park Movie was only a 15with the amount of bad language in that when Kevin Smith's films are just as profane and they are rated 18. And that goes for Anime too. Elfen Lied only got a15 rating which surprised me.
That said some 18 films have been unfairly rated. Some of the older Martial Arts films have 18 ratings when the fights are comparatively tame when you see the violence in modern films. Classics like Iron Fisted Monk or Snake In The Eagle's Shadow are nowhere near bad enough to warrant an 18.
Here's where the rating system gets fuzzy you can utter the F Bomb once and get a 12a rating.
The reason why South Park got away with it and Kevin Smiths films dont is the C Bomb. SP didn't use it more than once if at all where as KS films have liberal use. I do however agree with you on the nudity and the older 'violent' movies need reclassifying.